Why wouldn't they just vote "NO" if they didn't have time to read the whole bill?
That's what i would call responsbility in the first place.
Why isn't this being discussed at all, besides talking about why anybody voted the way they did? This should be an outrage among congressmembers. Reminds me of the 'Patriot' Act, when most members didn't read it.
Besides, what is wrong with voting no anyway? Ron Paul did it on most occasions, and not only had he have very good reasons for it, but it also helped the country a great deal. Why are people afraid to say NO??
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul.