Comment: so are all transitional fossils fake, which show exactly that?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Zero evolution (see in situ)

Joη's picture

so are all transitional fossils fake, which show exactly that?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil

You're approaching this from a distinctly human perspective, as if each species is "a goal", clearly defined, when it really is nothing more than summed variations significant enough to stop interbreeding. If that happens and the things still look the same, no one really cares that you don't see a difference, they've become two different species and that's that. You can be unhappy they're "not the right kind of different information", but only those basing their beliefs on Gitt will care. Gitt was (in some parts wholly misapplying information theory and elsewhere) being very vague with his terminology to skirt around exactly this issue.

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?