Comment: Actually no. Ron Paul's

In post: Judge Napolitano On Spending: 'You Don't Cut Cancer Out One Cell At A Time, You Cut It All Out'

In reply to comment: Ron Paul's budget cut $1 (see in situ)

Actually no. Ron Paul's

Submitted by Dr. NO. on Thu, 01/03/2013 - 18:54. Permalink

Actually no. Ron Paul's budget was mathematically flawed. IIRC, it double-counted some cuts in mandatory spending. Actual cuts were only 707 billion (or so).

He also balanced the budget in three years by using the CBO's terrible assumption that we will have more than 7% in real growth per year over the next 5 years.

Rand Paul's budget also has a mathematical mistake (really only save 450 billion) and uses the same mistakes the CBO makes.

—

Plan for eliminating the national debt in 10-20 years:

Overview: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2010/09/12/my-plan-for-reducin...

Specific cuts; defense spending: http://rolexian.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-detailed-look-a