Home

Comment: The building was buckling, but from what? Not heat.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE (see in situ)

SteveMT's picture

The building was buckling, but from what? Not heat.

Submitted by SteveMT on Sun, 01/06/2013 - 18:31.

Remember, the soon-to-be-killed brave woman standing in the hole of WTC1.
The Woman At The Edge Of The Abyss
http://rense.com/general66/spainw.htm

There is no heat in that hole sufficient to melt ASTM E119 certified steel. She would not be standing there if there was.

"We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications. Additionally, I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all."
http://rense.com/general59/ul.htm