The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Damned If You Do, and If You Don't
Damned If You Do, and If You Don't
In this corner, you have the idea that everything should be searched, because the terrorists could be using that lady in a wheelchair unbeknownst to her, or perhaps holding a family member hostage. No exceptions.
In the other corner, you have the idea that profiling should be done, so you're looking for names on a no-fly list, sweating, and strange or alien people--selective enforcement.
In another corner, you have a weird hybrid where you try to take a hard line with people of a certain age, gaining none of the advantages and all the disadvantages of the first two approaches, plus you give Alex Jones something to talk about on national TV.
I still say, hold a cocktail party for half an hour at the gate, and if you don't feel comfortable with your fellow passengers, take a later flight. Bring your own weapons, if you want. Statistically, it would still be safer than driving.
What do you think? http://consequeries.com/