Comment: One quick question

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: The problem is: (see in situ)

One quick question

I don't understand how this is true, "But, the one thing they can NOT do is escape the penalties of their actions if they "harm" someone in violation of the law, and lying-cheating-stealing is "harming". If you know Title 42 and Torts and you really put these corrupt Judges in a bind."

Obviously, to hold the judge accountable one would have to utilize a court; which means another judge. How does this system hold itself accountable, when everybody involve have been violating laws eversince they started 'Practicing Law.' This is what I don't get.

The Mafia wont stop, when you point out to them that what they are doing violates the law and your rights; and I personally don't think the government will either.

Someone posted about the Dick Act of 1902 and how it gauantees the 2nd ammendment can never be violated and that the Dick Act can never be repealed. Yet they(the government) have been violating that law every time they pass a new gun control meassure. Also, they violate that law every time they use the National Guard in any capacity but to fight-off an invasion or quell an uprising.

So, the precedent is set that the Federal Government doesn't really give a damn about laws; and I really don't see how one can force the Judge to abide by the law. As I stated earlier, most people never heard of any of this stuff, so to them it just sounds like people looking to break the law. If the people are not informed then trying to hold the judge accountable would be a joke.