The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Is Tytler right?
Is Tytler right?
I don't consider Tytler's model to be self evident. It has several faults and does not necessarily represent the ONLY possible cycle of events. For example, Tytler treats "bondage" as if it is at the extreme worst of a cyclical gradient, but that's not how it really works. Most Americans will tell you today that America has not yet "fallen", yet they ALL are in various states of bonadage. High taxes. High regulation. Loss of certain freedoms. Etc.
Tytler's model, however, tends to suggest that during "abundance", there is no bondage. We are currently in a time of relative abundance, however, and are also bound more than we were a decade ago.
A simpler and more accurate model is probably this:
And its simpler yet if we leave out the causes:
Tytler greatly overplays "faith" in my observation. Roughly 80% of Americans claim to have faith (of the Christian sort), yet we continue to sink into despotism. Yes, someone always wants to argue that these people don't have TRUE faith, yet there is no passage in the Bible that clearly and succinctly defines "Christian" or "Christianity".
But besides that, does Tytler (or anybody else) expect God to come down here and reform our government for us, if only we'll turn to the "true" version of faith? Or is it rather the expectation that people of "faith" will develop in themselves the high character necessary to free themselves from despotism?
If that's the case, that seems to be failing, too, for our churches, for whatever reason, put out only a very, very few people with this sort of character.
Don't get me wrong, whether it comes out of the churches or someplace else, without that sort of character, we are hopeless. But if anyone thinks that "faith" is the answer, I hope they have in mind some manner of "faith" that is distinct from that which we can already observe to be useless for such things.
Jack Pelham
www.jackpelham.com
www.characternotincluded.com
www.ruleoflawrestoration.com