Everyone keeps saying what the owner should or shouldn't do. Dr. Paul himself believes in the free market and non-coercive behavior. While it may be nice for him to have his domain and while many on here may be happy to give it to Dr. Paul, the fact is that the new owner now has something of value that he is, from what I understand, running competently. No one can be forced to give up there property. If all the people on here who say that Dr. Paul should own it would donate, they can probably raise enough to make a very attractive offer. But, you must also consider as has been stated that the last group in control of the domain completely dropped the ball and lost it in the first place. So, it may be in better, hands now.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: