Comment: Understanding math?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I have a question (see in situ)

Understanding math?

"I do not know what he is talking about specifically. Do you understand?"

You cannot see all these things like a math problem, or like an electric circuit diagram, so I understand your point of view from my point of view. If I can help you then some day you will see these things as an electric circuit diagram and math providing the accurate, specific, answers.

You pick this quote:

"In all the years I’ve been a journalist, I’ve never know public consciousness to have risen as fast as it’s rising today. Yes, its direction and shape is unclear, partly because people are now deeply suspicious of political alternatives, and because the Democratic Party has succeeded in seducing and dividing the electoral left. And yet this growing critical public awareness is all the more remarkable when you consider the sheer scale of indoctrination, the mythology of a superior way of life, and the current manufactured state of fear."

That is the same thing as the words spoken between Alex Jones and Gerald Celente here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMgbWKTeyfY

Time 41:55 "Great awakening...a lot of Thomas Paine's work is written in the context of the Great Awakening."

"I believe...we are going to have another Great Awakening." Gerald Celente

"I’ve never know public consciousness to have risen as fast as it’s rising today." John Pilger

Way back in my experience, in the 80s, when I first started speaking out about Legal Crime, even before Waco, before I joined an armed march on Washington with Linda Thomson to try criminal congresspeople, before I ran for Congress as a Libertarian, before I found the one other conspiracy theorist speaking out who is named Ron Paul, a surprise to me at the time, since Ron Paul was not only a congressman at the time, he was in office at the time, before 911, before ever hearing a word from Alex Jones, I witnessed exactly what is being discussed here as a growing awareness of accurate perception concerning the future of mankind heading into light, not rushing like a man with his hair on fire into a burning inferno, or off a cliff. This growing awareness of accurate perception is what I call the path of least resistance whereby the internet can be seen in context of an electric circuit, and previous to the internet there was television, and television was controlled by these Legal Criminals, and information was bottled up in those television shows. No information holding Legal Crime to account for Legal Crime was allowed into the circuit. Everyone was force fed the same lies: constantly. There was very much resistance, almost insurmountable resistance, insulation, and definite, defined, narrow, paths, corridors, wires, wavelengths, tightly controlled, monitored, shaped, selected, judged, handled, meticulously engineered, and scientifically perfected to ensure that no good deed ever reaches the targets, only falsehood, only lies, only response conditioning, only behavioral modification, only the single, myopic, brainwashed, viewpoint. You can see that viewpoint now.

Neutrality

A new word, clearly in view, now, and clearly false.

Why is it clearly false?

There is now competition. The television is still in the circuit, with all the narrow paths that information travels in that circuit, but now the internet is placed in parallel like a block of gold covering every person and thereby connecting every person to every other person. The path of least resistance now goes around, bypassing the narrow bands and circuits of "established order", and anyone can reach anyone else, and single person can reach every other person, and all that one person has to do is do a better job in direct competition with every other person including all the Legal Criminals.

How hard can it be to outdo Legal Criminals?

What is the goal?

What do the people want?

Do they want more lies to cover up their own desires to make parking lots out of the countries where brown people live, so as to then be able to reduce their cost at the gas station each time they fill up their gasoline powered cars and trucks?

Even if that is the goal, those who want better lies can now find the best liar, for the least cost, the best bang for the buck, by shopping at Price Watch, or whatever best competitor finds its way to the top of the Search Engine.

People equate me to Socialism, and therefore I must be anti-capitalist, right?

Wrong.

If it is true, then it can be accurately measured as true.

Right?

What is left out of the equation?

A demand for an effective way to avoid abandoning all the victims?

A demand for an effective way to avoid punishing innocent people for fun and profit?

A demand for a way to reach toward those goals without having to disconnect everyone from everyone else, where every man, women, and child, is for himself, every man for himself, and no one will ever be allowed to help another - ever?

What do you think socialism is if you look past the fake versions?

But you can't, because the resistance is still in your mind, not on the television. The resistance to understanding has been imported, injected, planted, into your brain. You are told to obey the order to hate PINK without question. The color, the label, the THING is to blame, so focus your own attention on what - exactly?

I can't help you past a certain point.

"This may very well be the most powerful and dangerous ideology we have ever known because it is open-ended. This is liberalism. I’m not denying the virtues of liberalism — far from it. We are all beneficiaries of them. But if we deny its dangers, its open-ended project, and the all-consuming power of its propaganda, then we deny our right to true democracy, because liberalism and true democracy are not the same. Liberalism began as a preserve of the elite in the 19th century, and true democracy is never handed down by elites. It is always fought for and struggled for." John Pilger

That is what I call a closed loop. The victims are indoctrinated into a false belief that no other viewpoint is valid - ever - and that can be seen as Monopoly.

Monopoly no longer exists as soon as there is competition.

Competition is the force that forces a move from lower quality to higher quality and the same force forces a move from higher cost to lower cost.

Keep the television monopoly going, in your mind, for as long as it lasts, but a few generations from now, or sooner, competition may prevail, as in a second great awakening, as in public consciousness rising rapidly, as in a growing awareness of a more accurate perspective finding its way from one person to the next, where then there are two, and then those two find two, an then four, and then sixteen, and then two hundred and fifty six, on and on.

How many places have I tried to join the group, to speak the truth, to warn other people, to offer solutions, and have my behind removed by someone, by way of deceit, by way of willfully inventing lies. You see that here too. How many people are infected with the monopoly viewpoint? What is the trend?

1. Rapidly contain all competitive viewpoints into one dictatorial viewpoint that resorts to any means by which all other viewpoints are rendered powerless.

2. Rapidly expanding allowance for any viewpoint to gain currency according to the many individual choices seeking better and leaving worse behind.

I have to finish the John Pilger link, and then get back to your response. It is growing late in the morning.

I stopped listening to impart the concept of "open ended" as reported by John Pilger (who himself may be suffering a closed loop) and this concept has to be understood in the context of POWER and specifically in the context of Legal Crime. The targeted victims are inside the closed loop of self-deception. The Legal Criminals are not. The Legal Criminals do whatever they want when they want and by the time the Legal Criminals let their victims know that they are going to do something, that something has already been done a decade earlier.

Back to John Pilger: I had to get that out (in my viewpoint).

__________________________________________________
specifically these words: ..."and because the Democratic Party has succeeded in seducing and dividing the electoral left."

I do not know what he is talking about specifically. Do you understand?
___________________________________________________

John Pilger acknowledges the counterfeit left as being separate and distinctly counterfeit, in my opinion. I would like to discuss my opinion with John Pilger, to iron out a few concerns about his view on voluntary and involuntary associations. Obviously the counterfeit left is involuntary, as the counterfeit people on the left define the meaning of involuntary associations: resort to deceit, resort to threats of violence, and resort to violence upon the innocent.

"How do I know that this is not the same lies but a different tune."

Consider separating the information offered by the person from the person offering the information.

"So, please, bear with me. My mind is not closed. But I have no way of knowing the truth. Who says Pilger is telling the truth?"

Try, if you will, to stop asking if John Pilger is telling the truth, and instead ask, if you will, if the information is true.

That may help.

"Maybe he works for the Soviets and is exploiting Western weaknesses. We, the West, have many enemies, or so it seems, and it seems we have probably made many enemies in the last 50 years."

Which soviets? Do you mean the soviets paid to be soviets by the people running The Dollar Hegemony as that Gang is currently changing the color of their stationary and the money you will be forced to pay for, as debt, currently being spent to prosecute World War III?

You are on a side that is against another side?

True or false?

If true, then which side are you on?

Why are you on that side?

If false, then why do you choose the words you choose as if you are on a side?

If you are on a side and you can't even describe the side you are on in a way that is measurably accurate, then that is a clue. Dig deeper.

If you are on a side and you can't even describe why you are on a side in a measurably accurate way, then that is a clue. Dig deeper.

"We, the West, have many enemies, or so it seems, and it seems we have probably made many enemies in the last 50 years."

You parrot the word "west" as if to acknowledge something real. Do you even understand the meaning of that one word?

West is a direction, there is no such place as west.

"I realize I am sidetracked from bookwork. I hope you can bear with me in that respect as well."

Dragons are lurking in your mind, and mine, I think, and it helps to compare notes with someone willing to slay dragons.

Joe