Comment: I've been skipping over a lot of the Sandy Hook stuff

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Hmm: (see in situ)

Michael Nystrom's picture

I've been skipping over a lot of the Sandy Hook stuff

I don't know what to make of it, but I think there is s I'm approaching Chapel Perilous (once again). Some of the most unbelievable things have turned out to be true, so who knows how far that damn rabbit hole goes?

Is this whole thing like the Truman show?

BTW, if you're glossing over the Piers stuff, you might have missed this:

Ben Shapiro Pwns Piers
http://www.dailypaul.com/269623/piers-owned-again-by-ben-sha...

It has gotten a lot of upvotes (even though people say he's a neocon) because he kicks Piers's butt in a way I that I think a lot of people wish Alex Jones did. Cool, calm, rational.

At one point he accuses Piers of standing on the graves of the children of Sandy Hook and pontificating. He actually said that, "Standing on the graves of those children."

And Morgan said, "How dare you accuse me of that."

Shapiro: "Well, its true."

Morgan: "How dare you accuse me of that. How dare you."

Shapiro: "Well, you can keep saying that, but its true."

That is one post I had in mind when I was talking about emotion. People liked it because he beat up on Piers. But Shapiro also conceded a lot of ground about how intrusive the gov't sh/could be.

BTW, do you know the answer to the pop quiz?

He's the man.