The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I would prefer Bob Murphy,
I would prefer Bob Murphy,
I would prefer Bob Murphy, especially since that a debate between Murphy and Krugman is already trying to be set up and especially since Krugman recently wrote about Murphy in his blog. But if Murhpy was not available, my next choice would be Tom Woods. If he wasn't available, my next choice would be Hans Hermann Hoppe (actually, now that I think about it Hoppe would be my first choice). Then Marc Faber. Then Jim Rogers. Then Dan D'amico. Then Walter Block. Lew Rockwell. Ron Paul (he already debated him quite successfully). That one Austrian Spanish economist (I forget his name). I love Peter, but he would be on the bottom of my list.
Replies to this comment: