Comment: Topics

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Why are these words true? (see in situ)


Your words: “There is a big difference, in my opinion, between taking the guns away from those who have them in Germany or England or even Switzerland or Australia, compared to taking the guns away from people in America.”

As far as why it is OK to disarm certain others because their parents did not take or could not afford, whether by money or by circumstance, the opportunity to flee their homeland for a more liberated contest of freedom, I say this:

Read the Declaration of Independence...ALL Men are Created Equal with certain una:

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

I still do not understand why say that unarming certain populations is different than unarming Americans when the reason for arms is so that people can justly obtain and maintain their rights? I cannot see how it is the fault of the children in those countries that their ancestors did not flee to a more liberating place. Why should they and their parents be disarmed? Why are they not worthy of certain NATURAL rights given by the Creator? That simple and basic right of self-protection and self-preservation?

As far as I can understand Australia has already been disarmed: & & &

It seems Switzerland is still armed though
Alaska: Cut off trade routes and power grids. Only the wiliest frontiers people will survive the embargo. As far as criminals go, the oil in Alaska may be the prize they are seeking should the United States come under siege.
Parasite City: Yes I read it and we had a discussion. I cannot remember all of it right now. I can go back into the vast abyss. As a matter of fact. I read more of the document than just Parasite City. I remember having some questions as to why it was bad that those people used their money to collect interest and you answered and helped me understand. I cannot remember what I understood.
On the topic:

“It may be a good idea to continue the discussion in a separate topic as the subject matter turns toward the verses you now offer.
We can continue here as well.
I do not accept the information offered by you in reference to those versus. It may be a good idea to concentrate on one thing at a time concerning why I cannot accept your interpretation of those words.
1. Who exactly is This Lord when The Lord orders human beings to murder innocent children, and then one human being listens to that order and that one human being obeys that order without question?
Who is speaking those orders - exactly.
Who obeys those orders - exactly.”

Would you like to continue that topic here?:

Willl popped in here: and is talking to both you and me and gave me that link above.