Comment: Jack needs to rethink his approach

(See in situ)

Jack needs to rethink his approach

Attacking people on your side usually had negative results. I would suggest he should avoid throwing around the term "conspiracy theorist", which is an ad hominem slur (normally comes from mainstream media/government spokesmodels). This is the label they throw on anybody that isn't buying the BS de jour. Jesse Ventura has fallen into the same trap of letting your adversaries define you.

"It is also important for the State to inculcate in its subjects an aversion to any outcropping of what is now called 'a conspiracy theory of history.' For a search for 'conspiracies,' as misguided as the results often are, means a search for motives, and an attribution of individual responsibility for the historical misdeeds of ruling elites. If, however, any tyranny or venality, or aggressive war imposed by the State was brought about not by particular State rulers but by mysterious and arcane 'social forces,' or by the imperfect state of the world -- or if, in some way, everyone was guilty -- then there is no point in anyone's becoming indignant or rising up against such misdeeds. Furthermore, a discrediting of 'conspiracy theories' will make the subjects more likely to believe the 'general welfare' reasons that are invariably put forth by the modern State for engaging in aggressive actions."