Comment: "Well, if people -the current

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: What you and most people (see in situ)

"Well, if people -the current

"Well, if people -the current inhabitants- allow for or put-up with either the State or gangs, then is it your job to interfere?"

you most certainly CAN interfere and not be "inconsistent" (as you falsly claim).

the residents of a state simply do not have the right to bind ALL residents of a state to their (the majorities) preference to live under the existing state. Individuals can only consent for themselves qua individuals.

therefore, the FSP people moving up there who fight to have the majorities decision NOT be applied to the entirety ARE acting in self defense and are not "inconsistent".

your entire argument hinges on the tacit assumption that the majority can speak for the entiriety.