Comment: There was opposition - that's a complex issue

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Disregard election results of 98% (see in situ)

There was opposition - that's a complex issue

Most of the opposition were either socialists (cf. Austrian Civil War of 1934), Austro-Fascists (who are hard to categorize in modern terms, a mix of middle-class, agrarian, christian, anti-socialist, monarchist-leaning folks, so most likely big- and small government conservatives; and a minority of monarchists still loyal to the house of Habsburg. Pro-Hitler agents had some opposition leaders killed after the civil war, including as you might know, Austro-fascist chancellor Dollfuß.

Concerning your point on Switzerland, here's what i found on lewrockwell.com
http://www.lewrockwell.com/walker/walker32.html

You also have to keep in mind that very, very soon after the civil war, opposition to the NSDAP was not only dangerous, but deadly. Under the Austro-Fascist Dollfuß and Schuschnigg governments, there was already distrust and suspicion to every form of anti-german opposition (being pro german generally and pro unification with germany specifically was mostly common since WW1) and opposing voices were quickly deemed as socialists, which was true in many cases).

An interesting role in Austian politics played Karl Renner, who was chancellor during the first republic (between WW1 and WW2)- he was a "social-democrat" who had favorable sentiments toward the german NSDAP and a possible annexation with Germany, and partially worked to promote it. Notably though, that was like mentioned above, before the Austrian Civil War of 1934 which deepened the social and economic crisis in the country on all levels and is regarded by many austrian intellectuals across the board as the prelude to the rise of the NSDAP in Austria.