If we go to USC Title 26 ss 6331 and read Section A, we get this:
Excerpt: " Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official."
When they send the bank a notice of levy, they always somehow seem to conveniently leave out Section A, but are sure quick to point out Section B to employers and banking officers to trick them into permission to levy against you.
Now ask yourself;
Are YOU an officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia?
If you're not, and they are charging you a tax on your income, don't we have labor dispute here? Um, I haven't received my government check yet, have you? I mean it says right there in their very own code, that they may Levy wages of officers, employees, etc. of the United States, the District of Columbia, etc. which is fine IF you're an officer, employee, etc. of that Corp/Territory.
Your 1st mistake was: Employing a tax law firm. When you did that, you became a ward of the state; unable to challenge jurisdiction; an imbecile and child of unsound mind - Corpus Juris Secundum
Your 2nd mistake was: Not studying and knowing the Law.
"Good luck with your scam, but I truly hope that no one takes you seriously unless they don't mind having their lives wrecked by the largest extortion racket in all of history."
Keep munching that purple grass like all the other sheep - Munch-munch-munch ... Mmmmmmmmmm, these internal statutes I'm not obligated to abide by taste like ice cream ... Munch-munch-munch - Baaaa-aaaa.
While you're here distorting facts and fear mongering, how about you answer the Million Dollar Question:
"What's the One Document, either local/state/federal gov't has in their possession that would contractually obligate anyone other than gov't employees and elected officials (who ARE receiving pay and benefits to abide by those internal statues and tax codes (ie: Title 1 - Title 50 US Code), to abide by those internal-statutory rules and tax codes, AND obligate us to do it for free - without pay and benefits of our own?"
Lets stop with the fear mongering and get down to the nuts and bolts of the argument, shall we?