I'm asking, do the facts matter?
"I'm thinking you're a bit confused. I didn't start any argument, you decided to dump insults on this post for some reason."
What is an insult?
You respond to my offering of competitive information with your viewpoint couched as if your viewpoint is true, and to me that insults me. I can let that go, it happens all the time.
So I ask questions. Where are these cases of me dumping insults?
The insult in view is The Constitution and all those who aid and abet the current criminals hiding their very serious crimes with that false front. You are now claiming that I am insulting you "for some reason"?
I'll ask again: Where are these cases of me dumping insults?
If I am guilty of such a thing I can know exactly what constitutes an insult to you, and then I can try not to repeat the error.
As to "for some reason", I can ask, do you feint ignorance here or do you assume that there is a reason, or is there any possible method that you can see by which you can find out the reason, if there is such a thing that you say is "for some reason"?
"I'm thinking you're a bit confused."
Based upon the actual evidence, that you are producing, in the form of words published on a forum, you are ignorant. If you think that the word ignorant is an insult, for some reason, I can ask.
Do you think that your condition of ignorance, and my pointing that out to you, is an insult, and for what reason do you think that your ignorance, and my pointing that fact out to you, is an insult if so?
"Get off YOUR high horse, I don't see you demanding everyone else here to BACKUP what they're claiming."
I have no horse. My horse is not high, since I have none. You replied to my accurate offering of the information offered in the video, and I am consistent in the continued responses I offer in discussion with people who respond to what I write on this forum. Specious arguments are the norm, for dictators in particular, since the actual facts do not serve liars, and therefore my chosen method of operation, in defense against liars, is to call the liars out on their lies, as if to say "show me" how your lies are in some way true - please.
If there is no information forthcoming, if instead of information forthcoming there is only diversion, then that routine is as obvious as the often publication of baseless opinion presented as fact.
"I posted a video and a historic reference to back up the reason or intent of gun ownership. Others may go and read them."
Others may also remain ignorant, as they wish, and others may swallow all the lies whole too.
"I posted a pro-gun right video of a discussion and you decide to go on a founding father hate discussion which I have no time for."
I recognize that routine right away. That is a diversionary routine. The injection of the word "hate" into the argument you are publishing falls into the hyperbole category, and this is not news.
If you have no time for your "hate" speech, then why did you begin your "hate" speech?
"Enjoy the day, reserve your hateful instruction and insults for your enemies, if I'm one of them for some reason, then I'll pray for you sir. You need them."
Previous to your claim of having "no time for" something, which appears to be your invention, production, and spreading of "hate speech", so you do this "hate speech" in your own words, and I quote you, and then you claim to not have time for it?
Note the question mark.
And then after you claim you have no time for what you yourself do, you do what you claim you have no time for again, so it is a hate speech sandwich with a false denial in the middle?
"May God richly bless you some day."
Please keep YOUR blessing off of me, I want no part of them, and your prayers too, please, leave me out.
The Daily Paul is a community