Comment: Putting your weak arguments in bold doesn't make them

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: He's not unknown! (see in situ)

Putting your weak arguments in bold doesn't make them

any stronger.

It's gibberish to assume you know how Rand's critics come to their conclusions. It's not even worth saying. Maybe you are too young to realize that yet.

I don't need a lecture from you. Rand's votes don't reveal enough about him, as far as I'm concerned. He has pandered to neocons and voted for sanctions on Iran. There is nothing Libertarian about that...sanctions are an act of war. What ideology does he embrace, that lets him sleep at night knowing he voted to make Iranians suffer?

So is he a real neocon or a panderer who's just trying to blend in until he can break out and reveal his inner freedom crusader? Is his strategy for the Greater Good or for personal gain? He turned his back on his own father by endorsing Romney while his dad was still in the race...you think he has loyalty to YOUR cause?