Comment: Okay let's suppose you agree with Libertarians on nothing

(See in situ)


Okay let's suppose you agree with Libertarians on nothing

except for non-interventionism and civil rights, and you have no care for the free markets--will Rand Paul be providing a step forward or backward on the two fronts you care about? I mean among people who can realistically win, don't even come up with a ridiculous name like Hillary Clinton for Andrew Quomo for the protection of civil liberties. i'm assuming you're (neo)liberal