Comment: fishy, I haven't read the

(See in situ)


fishy, I haven't read the

fishy, I haven't read the Swartz's website, but when he wrote about Semmelweis, did he discuss Semmelweis' contribution to medicine terminology, a contribution he was unaware of likely?

According to Carter, the last name of the author of the book I've been talking about, Semmelweis' contribution was the leading force against tradition medicine.

If Swartz didn't write about this contribution, then what I said in my comment below is wrong. Rather than Swartz and Carter writing about Semmelweis similarly, they would have written him fairly differently.

School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me

Study nature, not books. -Walton Forest Dutton, MD, in his 1916 book whose subject is origin (therefore what all healing methods involve and count on), simple and powerful.