Did it protect the right to bear arms? Of course not.
What firearm owners were being protected?
Typical Reagan double talk. That and his War on Drugs.
Apparently the Constitution has been overthrown, bit by bit
At least the Gun Control Act of 1968 didn't deny their diregard for the Constitution.
Cars are deadly, can be used as weapons. By your argument no on needs one. Buses and bicycles are good enough for slaves.
Free includes debt-free!
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
E-mail address:
Comment: Firearm Owners Protection Act. ???
Firearm Owners Protection Act. ???
Did it protect the right to bear arms? Of course not.
What firearm owners were being protected?
Typical Reagan double talk. That and his War on Drugs.
Apparently the Constitution has been overthrown, bit by bit
At least the Gun Control Act of 1968 didn't deny their diregard for the Constitution.
Cars are deadly, can be used as weapons. By your argument no on needs one. Buses and bicycles are good enough for slaves.
Free includes debt-free!