"So, your argument is that the resulting systems, whatever they happened to be, would be worse than the current system? And that any market solution that arose would be a failure without better people involved?"
I am arguing for a Minarchist state, we currently have a huge government that crushes freedom. These are two different things
(Btw, it helps me to restate someone elses statement in my own words and confirm that their original intent remains to insure I understand the statement 100%).
BTw, It might be more helpful if you don't completely alter what another person wrote. You can just write my argument for me, and argue against that strawman if that is more helpful for you. Don't know how that will advance anything though?
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: