Comment: This was more likely just a

(See in situ)

This was more likely just a

This was more likely just a transposition error, not a legitamate attempt to censor Rothbard's name. Who actually reads these transcripts? I would guess that the number is miniscule compared to the number who watched the video interview. The names of Mises and Hayek are still there, so the point which calls the absence of Rothbard's name an intentional exclusion is not really sensible. And, upon a comparison of the transcript with theI actual interview, it is apparent that the exclusion of Rothbard's name is one error amongst many.

This is much ado about nothing in my opinion.