Comment: Most important notes here:

(See in situ)


Most important notes here:

How does any person (doctor, scientist, whoever) qualify to determine the eligibility of an other person to exercise their RIGHT (2nd Amd) - other than through a court ruling by verdict of actually HAVING broken the law?

This is a question of priorities:

May any academic/scientific finding/argument infringe on any fundamental law such as the bill of rights?
And if so, why and by which qualification?