I'll show you though. One second.
Now in another interview he was accused by one of his former aides who went on to say that Dr.Paul stated that Bush knew ahead of time..
"Dondero writes that that Paul himself is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist:
He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhaps the attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and that the Bush administration might have known about the attacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathies whatsoever for those who died on 9/11, and pretty much forbade us staffers from engaging in any sort of memorial expressions, or openly asserting pro-military statements in support of the Bush administration."
All of which, Dr.Paul vehemently disagreed with as truth.
Now I know that Bush had prior knowledge about a "possible" attack and refused to act on it.. This is credible intelligence from other countries with whom we share information with. Is that clear evidence that he knew about it and wanted it to happen or that he was involved in some way? No, but we may never know the truth if it was so.
As for Dr.Paul.. I think even if he does believe it, I doubt he'd say so without real proof and even then I'm not sure if he would really.. If I were him, I'd find some way to get the truth out without putting his family's life in jeopardy. I wouldn't blame him one bit for keeping it to himself. There is mouthing off and exposing issues then there is mouthing off and fucking your life up and the lives of everyone you know, possibly.
Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: