Comment: No no, what I was saying was

(See in situ)

No no, what I was saying was

No no, what I was saying was on page 13 it is a clear description of the case against DOT as to why it was dismissed. This backs your ideas about private contractors, agencies, etc. That was proof enough to me there is something to this.

People need to see it on paper, case files, to be honest, I've been looking into this for a little while, and outside a few you tube videos, there isn't a lot of real world documentation. True there is a lot of material out there, but to get the masses, as you know, this has to be put together in a nice short package. Sad but true. Keep it up south, keep refining the message, believe it not you are getting more people on board.