There has been a massive push from notable pundits around the U.S. to, in my opinion, discourage active truth-seeking into the events at Sandy Hook and other events. Glenn Beck, and more locally, I just heard Gary Nolan, former Libertarian Party candidate for president and radio talk show host call out and basically disparage truth seeking members of the libertarian party and others who are still actively investigating the events on Dec. 14. I know there are others and I actually like most of what Nolan brings to the table, but these two are on the top of my head since I just heard them talking about the matter this morning as if they're just sooo tired of it. It's like they're saying, "Gosh, just stop with all the asking questions nonsense."
Yet, their own conclusions into the Sandy Hook events are pure conjecture, nothing more. They claim they are debunking the whole alternative theory even though in reality they only debunk maybe one question or two out of hundreds that are now being raised by concerned people across they world.
And even when they claim they are the debunkers, for example Beck, he is actually merely compiling debunking theories that others came up with a long while ago and taking credit for it. For example, the picture of Madeliene Parker with the president. Beck acts as if he did that. But that was debunked almost a month ago. Yet, just because they bring up that one issue, that one mistake, all of the other questions surrounding the events are now null and void of credibility?
And these people, Beck and Nolan, are supposedly versed in socialist/facsist/communist history? Nolan asks in a nutshell: are we supposed to believe that an entire state and local police dept. is in on the conspiracy or they agreed to lie to the entire nation? My answer: I don't know. Maybe, maybe not. It is still being looked into. We really don't have all of the information yet and I find it unwise to jump to conclusions yet. But just because you raise that question does not mean there can be no alternative theories.
Don't they realize that entire sections of government have been in on conpiracies before in the Soviet Union, in Germany, in other socialist countries who have an agenda against certain rights or freedoms of their contituencies? For example, the former Soviet Union's coverup of the murder rate and serial murders in the 40s and 50s in order to paint a picture of a communist state as infallible and without murder or corruption. Entire local or national agencies were complicit with these coverups whether they knew it or not. There's also the issue of compartmentalization. A good fiction book on this murder coverup topic in the Soviet Union is Child 44 by Tom Rob Smith. I highly recommend it.
Point is, Beck and Nolan are pundits whose job has revolved around questioning certain aspects of government and believing in and promoting what could be deemed conspiracies of their own (such as the conspiracy that Ron Paul supporters are dangerous). Yet, for some reason, when it comes to these mass shootings that always seem to be followed by national discussions of our rights being stripped from us, we're just supposed to believe what the government has to say or what the media says. Even when they've proven themselves to be incompetent with regards to telling the truth or at least the whole story time after time after time. That doesn't sit well with me, and I don't care if they were local cops or state cops saying these things. Local police and communities have been infiltrated before, why not now? I'm not saying that's the case. I'm merely saying the verdict is still out on this case despite the bullying by some people who think we're not helping the debate for liberty and gun rights with our "crazy theories".
To that, I ask what could be more helpful than finding a truth so damning that it completely pulls the rug out from under the feet of the people and groups pushing for tyrannical gun control measures?
I still think there's so much more to this. Don't give up the search, no matter how long it takes. Don't get discouraged by name calling and conjecture. Point it out and keep fighting. I was once a neo-con warmonger myself, but active truth-seeking individuals like many on DP and other sites were determined to find and expose information that eventually helped me look at the world in a whole new way.