Comment: All power to you man...

I just think that the wealth of Evidence is on the "Conspiratorial" side of the argument. I do however find it Ironic that people resort to the Same ad hominem attacks toward people who haven't come to terms with the 911 cover-up - ( see what I did there :) ) - and call them trolls. It is sad that people so quickly use the label "troll" the same way non-911 "truthers" use "Conspiracy Theorist".

In no way do I deny that there are Trolls among us... people who's goal is to distract and divide, but I think sometimes our passion gets the best of us.

My argument has always been that despite the paucity of "UNDENIABLE" evidence, there exists a litany of firm circumstantial evidence and testimony... enough so that if the crime where any other crime and any defendant had that much circumstantial evidence presented against them, there would be little doubt in the minds of the jury that the alleged person was guilty.

It always seemed to me that it is the non-911 truthers who throw occam's razor out the window trying to deflate the 911 truthers arguments... but maybe that's just my take on it.

I think the biggest hangup that WE have as Americans, is accepting the possibility that our Government could and would do such a thing. It's like we are parents who do not want to come to terms with the likeliness that our Child is an out-of-control Tyrant and capable of Evil.

Personally, I don't think anyone who believes in the 911 cover-up is Ever going to change their mind. In fact, I do not believe I have ever met someone who believed in the 911 cover-up ever say... "ya know... Now that I have thought about it more, maybe our Government didn't conspire to allow 911 to happen". From my experience, it has always been the other way around... I would love for everyone to get on board with the 911 truth, but each person follows their own path.

Good luck in your research.

P.S. There is one troll here though... he goes by the name Liberty_First... My gut is about 89% sure. :)