Comment: Yeah...

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: ok (see in situ)


...but would you have fewer qualms if the mother killed a newborn after rape than if she did so without a rape having occurred? I imagine not, and probably because of the baby being a person with rights?

So, assuming someone really believes the unborn baby is just as much a person with the same right to Life, how is it any less of an atrocity because it happens in the womb?

At least a pro-choicer who advocates for the right to kill the unborn because they aren't a person is consistent, but how could someone who really does think the unborn is a person look the other way when they could not with the newborn?