Comment: ... and a TRAITOR.

... and a TRAITOR.

For, as a Commander in Chief, he isn't supposed to break the laws. Any law. Yet, he doesn't just break them, he is, with others, treading upon what is the SUPREME LAW, UNTOUCHABLE:

the Constitution.

And as a TRAITOR, the People ought to charge, prosecute him as such, and request the corresponding punishment. Guess which.

I'm no citizen, I'm no historian, yet out of mere common sense intuition, I guess it's not randomly the "Supreme Court" was named like so. I'm going to check right after this on the origin and rationale for the naming CHOICE, if it's well-known and on historians record.

"Supreme Court" - I'd have put it that way if only because there indeed is, without being too far fetched, a set of "supreme laws" to be followed BY EVERYBODY:

the recognition, obedience to, respect of the VERY rights and THE TEXT which founded this country, for its People.

The Supreme Court judges have nothing "supreme" as persons. But what they supposedly upheld to defend and protect IS SUPREME.

And ObaMARX, ON RECORD, in spoken English, DENIED, DISREGARDED THE PREROGATIVES OF THE SUPREME COURT'S VERY FUNCTION.

If it's no TREASON -and done IN PLAIN SIGHT, IN PUBLIC, which is just absolutely MIND BOGGLING to me- I really have no clue what is...

IMO, we tend to focus too much, the OP included, on the horrendous consequences of the traitors' "policies".

We also forget all too often to see things through much simpler lenses:

treason IS TREASON.

And THAT is the ULTIMATE, MOST SERIOUS CRIME a living person can do AGAINST their country.