Comment: The Issue is Money

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Abortion is morally wrong. (see in situ)

The Issue is Money

No, Dr. Paul wanted a FEDERAL LEVEL Sanctity of Life Act. He proposed it in 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011. He wanted STATES to be able to PROTECT the unborn.

Ron Paul said this: "Unless we understand…we must protect life, we cannot protect liberty."

He is opposed to abortion.

Not a single co-sponsor:
"a) Finding- The Congress finds that present day scientific evidence indicates a significant likelihood that actual human life exists from conception.
(b) Declaration- Upon the basis of this finding, and in the exercise of the powers of the Congress--
(1) the Congress declares that--
(A) human life shall be deemed to exist from conception, without regard to race, sex, age, health, defect, or condition of dependency; and
(B) the term `person' shall include all human life as defined in subparagraph (A); and
(2) the Congress recognizes that each State has the authority to protect lives of unborn children residing in the jurisdiction of that State."
Abortion is a political money game where women and unborn children are but fodder. Why do you think there was not a single co-sponsor? Whose pockets are lined with the blood and suffering of unborn children and their mothers?