Comment: Here's a study on the reliability of scientific studies.

(See in situ)


Here's a study on the reliability of scientific studies.

67.4% of of retracted studies "were attributable to misconduct"

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)

"A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast, 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%). Incomplete, uninformative or misleading retraction announcements have led to a previous underestimation of the role of fraud in the ongoing retraction epidemic. The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has increased ∼10-fold since 1975."
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/27/1212247109