The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Totally agree with you fishy.
Totally agree with you fishy.
For all the pro-life supporters Rand gained today, he lost 10 times as many people who believe in the right to choose - even when that right is to choose NOT to have an abortion.
For the people who think this is a states right issue. Fine. It would have been interesting if things had been done that way. But may I remind you, 100 years ago, divorce was a very tawdry thing, a sin. You could only get a quick divorce in Nevada, or face a long, expensive, drawn-out ordeal in the other states. You know what happened? Like bowling pins falling, states passed no-fault divorce laws & you could get a divorce EVERYWHERE in a matter of a few decades.
The same thing would have happened if abortion had been a state, rather than federal issue. I'll bet you that EVERY state in the union would have had legalized abortion if it hadn't been done thru the Supremes & Roe v. Wade.
I am pro-choice, & part of that choice is the choice to not have an abortion. But, I feel that abortion should not be funded by federal or state government dollars.
Replies to this comment: