The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: We could agree on...
We could agree on...
I agree 100% with this post - thanks for sharing your opinion.
I want to point out an elephant in the room. So-called feminists and so-called Christians, and so-called principled atheists..etc. would agree that human trafficking of women for sex is wrong/unacceptable. There is NO disagreement here. I do not see a lot of feminists trying to stop this cancer. At best the number is marginal. I see some Christians - not a lot - active in preventing this behavior. I see some secular people (i.e. Google) donating and working towards eradicating this cancer.
I find it unprincipled that the feminist/pro-choice movement just focuses on this single issue. Human trafficking is widespread and really humiliating for the human being. It is a huge issue happenning all over the world. Why is there such an emphasis in promoting abortions and almost none in addressing this other issue? It seems to me that this is just a power struggle at high levels. Hillary Clinton, Feinstein, Pelosi are using this issue to grab power. It is more benefitial to them to use this to attack their political opponents than to work with these opponents to solve a problem where there is an agreement.
Replies to this comment: