Comment: To summarize...

(See in situ)

In post: Rand Paul...
In reply to comment: Yea (see in situ)

To summarize...

your debate "counterpoints":

1) awl19 is lacking in common sense (stupid)
2) you can't prove your point
3) make a bet to resolve the issue
4) awl19 is a numskull (stupid)
5) awl19 is a danger to your children
6) awl19 doesn't value freedom (bad person)
7) awl18 is irresponsible and careless (bad person)

What is your goal? To debate a political issue or to attack awl19's character?

Attacking a person's character (ad hominem) is considered a logical fallacy and most debate professors award F's when it is used.

Removing all the ad hominem leaves:

1) you can't prove your point and 2) make a bet


~wobbles but doesn't fall down~