Comment: Eh.... not quite accurate.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: As Dr Ron Paul recently (see in situ)

Eh.... not quite accurate.

"Nevertheless because he does represent a more moderate voice in foreign policy than the neo-conservatives can tolerate, they are dragging his name through the mud. In choosing Hagel, then, we can hope the president is signaling that he will pursue a less aggressive foreign policy in his second term. But we cannot count on it."

"So we should be optimistic that the president may see the wisdom in pursuing a foreign policy that is truly in our national interest, but we should always keep an eye on the policies over the personnel."

That kind of puts your comment in a different light, as Dr. Paul was not so much objecting to Hagel as he was to Brennan and others who surround the President.