Comment: must have been a very 'progressive' family

(See in situ)


must have been a very 'progressive' family

if this father agreed that his son would carry his wife's name. How often does that happen nowadays?
Why don't I believe this man? There's something that strikes me so wrong about his testamony. Some of what he says I agree with, re: mental illness issues though not as he espouses them.
But does he really think his 'son' would want him to help rip up our Constitution's most important Amendment? His argument is so very careully couched at some points - ordinary citizens don't need defense (he calls the 'assault') weapons, crimnials will always have weapons so let's not bother about trying to get weapons away from them just make the punishment stricter when they do have them but definitely take guns away from law-abiding people. This guy isn't thinking straight at all and just blubbering LSM talking points.

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison