The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Not mentioned, but the same limited Freedom issue: drones
Not mentioned, but the same limited Freedom issue: drones
Does obtaining a warrant make the use of surveillance drones acceptable? Could they be used to acceptably assassinate someone in the U.S. if the president first obtained a warrant? Drones are unconstitutional, with or without a warrant.
Sen. Paul Proposes Bill Requiring Warrants for Drone Use
6/13/2012 @ 12:27PM
Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has introduced a bill requiring the government to obtain a warrant prior to using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV or drone). The bill, S.3287, also known as The Preserving Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act is a good start for the public debate about how to regulate drones.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregorymcneal/2012/06/13/sen-pau...
Replies to this comment: