The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Dis-arm the police?

(See in situ)

Dis-arm the police?

The gentleman who questioned the need for police to be heavily armed has a point.

Ninety years ago, following two national wars, Ireland had a heavily armed society. The new government was faced with trying to establish a new police force in a country where much of the population had reason not to trust or support the government.

The minister responsible, (who was himself a war criminal) decided that the new force, unlike that it replaced would be un-armed. Even when dealing with people who were known to be proficient gunmen, the new force proved successful, and in the years that followed, gun-crime became very rare. People dumped their weapons and other than the various campaigns against British occupation of the North-East, the use of guns became almost unheard of.

If there is a lesson to be learned, it is that a government who wishes it's citizenry to disarm willingly, must first disarm itself.

This may not be your goal, but it may be of interest.

Pro-Life, pro-family, pro-freedom, pro-worker, pro Ron Paul