Comment: "all the articles that have sprung up because of this tweet."

(See in situ)


"all the articles that have sprung up because of this tweet."

Those would include my article on pts(d). I'd been thinking about this idea ever since I heard some caller mention it to Alex Jones a couple years ago as an aside to his main comment.

Ron Paul making his statement gave me the courage to finally put this notion, that PTS(d) is a fallacy, out there in the public realm. Amazingly with 60 comments nobody has disagreed with it. And it could have easily gone the other way for me to have made/elaborated on such a bold statement.

Pandacentricism will be our downfall.