The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: Yeah actually, you are right

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Even the grab was battery (see in situ)

Yeah actually, you are right

Yeah actually, you are right on that part. I forgot the civil aspect of that. But it doesn't change anything. It is civil battery and there were no damages. There is no way anyone can say that he had any kind of damages from that "battery" when he kept following him and bothering him. The other battery, the punch, has an affirmative defense and any sane jury would not convict nor give the weasel guy damages.