Submitted by awl19 on Wed, 02/06/2013 - 05:07. Permalink
beyond a responsible doubt that the clip we saw was the original footage from the reporter? Because I can prove the clip linked was not submitted by a reporter. If it was, the user handle would be clearly represented as a news affiliate, not a personal ID.
Again, as I said, I am not denying that private property rights could not have been invoked, only that that weren't. If indeed someone was accusing me, as you say, of "raping little girls" and they were on my property, I'd simply say: "Get off my property." It's not hard, it's quite simple. Although, you make it out to be some extremely impossible situation.
The problem is that the older man did not clearly state via verbal or written representation that he did not want the reporter to enter. Physical abuse is no excuse.
Comment: Can you prove
Can you prove
beyond a responsible doubt that the clip we saw was the original footage from the reporter? Because I can prove the clip linked was not submitted by a reporter. If it was, the user handle would be clearly represented as a news affiliate, not a personal ID.
Again, as I said, I am not denying that private property rights could not have been invoked, only that that weren't. If indeed someone was accusing me, as you say, of "raping little girls" and they were on my property, I'd simply say: "Get off my property." It's not hard, it's quite simple. Although, you make it out to be some extremely impossible situation.
The problem is that the older man did not clearly state via verbal or written representation that he did not want the reporter to enter. Physical abuse is no excuse.
Replies to this comment: