Comment: Either

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I already told you that it (see in situ)

Either

He gained entry to the private property or not.

If he did indeed gain entry to the private property (which I believe he did not), he either entered against the consent of the owner or not.

You can't use "objectivism" in the court of law.

And in reply to your ad hominems: http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/2944607