Comment: Futile endeavors on purpose?

(See in situ)


Futile endeavors on purpose?

"(Obama and Biden are all over the map as if they don't agree, don't have a plan, are not prioritizing a strtigy)"

My purpose (distance myself from the above type of thinking).

Why?

Because I don't think that way, and because any sense of anyone thinking that I many be NOT ANTI RAND PAUL may be someone thinking I am pro whatever is meant by:

"(Obama and Biden are all over the map as if they don't agree, don't have a plan, are not prioritizing a strtigy)"

That, in my opinion, aught to be called out as being false.

Again:

My purpose (distance myself from the above type of thinking).

Why?

I don't like false things.

How does one, anyone, recognize something false?

How about competition?

A.
"(Obama and Biden are all over the map as if they don't agree, don't have a plan, are not prioritizing a strtigy)"

B.
"I believe the most powerful people keep themselves in power by remaining hidden and employ puppets such as Obama and Biden."

Question (relevant to my twice now stated goal): How can they be puppets and be held accountable for such a thing as "not prioritizing a strtigy [sic]"?

If they are puppets then, by that exact measure, whatever that means exactly, they are not as powerful as the puppet masters pulling the strings.

How deep does the tar go?

"War is spoils."

War is good for the economy?

I now have even more reason to get as far away as possible from any false connection between me, someone who appreciates the good things done by Rand Paul (with qualifications) and someone who produces communications like this:

"War is spoils."

War is massive torture and massive murder with a false front claiming that it is good.

Spoils is what, what happens to flesh when it is left out in the sun for days?

This is getting more rotten as I read:

"Ok so central banks,, printing monopoly money.. are buying peace, and why you don't have a nuke exploding over your head right now."

If the accounting is accurate then that can be proven. Which central bank, which purchases, and then, knowing those facts, the measure of exactly what is this "peace" can be understood.

Why don't I have a nuke exploding over my head right now?

Hmmmm.

I'm supposed to believe, let me get this right, please, I'm supposed to believe that the reason why a nuke isn't exploding over my head right now, or before I type the next letter, is "central banks,, printing monopoly money.. are buying peace,"

And:

"Ron Paul wanted us to join the GOP, become delegates, take committee seats, get elected into office and be the change you want.. that's what I've done. That's what I'm doing."

My thinking on that is such that the number 12, as in a randomly picked number of people in this country, sitting on a jury, and what are the odds that all of them think that the central bank, printing money, and buying peace, is the reason why I don't have a nuke exploding over my head right now.

What are the odds?

Joe