Comment: Many competitive solutions

(See in situ)


Many competitive solutions

One Monopoly Money Power

Not news:

http://www.depressionscrip.com/

http://michaeljournal.org/guernsey.htm

http://www.tennesseesonsofliberty.com/2013/01/alternative-cu...

http://www.lvrj.com/news/46074037.html

http://utopianist.com/2011/01/stimulus-writ-small-tiny-calif...

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/index.html

http://www.slideshare.net/LocalMoney/why-demurrage-built-in-...

http://www.lietaer.com/2010/03/the-worgl-experiment/

http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=s...

http://www.the-portal.org/mutual_banking.htm

http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf

http://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/labadie/2916966.0001.001/3?rgn=f...

"Bills of exchange, bank checks, and negotiable paper of all sorts add just so much to the body of the currency; and this issue is unlimited by law, and unlimited in fact, except by the exigencies of trade. They are just as really currency as the specie dollar, the greenback, or the bank bill. A field which has no fence up one of its sides is not fenced in, no matter how high and strong its fences may be on the other sides. So, the volume of currency is not, in any true sense, limited by prohibitions of free banking, by a return to specie basis, or by any other means, so long as negotiable paper can be freely issued by individuals; and this free issue of negotiable paper is too useful, and too well entrenched in necessity, ever hereafter to be interfered with. Commerce can be hindered and trammeled to some extent—by statute arrangements claiming to regulate the currency, whether by restrictive measures, or by flooding the community with over-issues; but the volume of the currency can no longer be adjusted by such means."

The reason why The FED remains powerful is a blind, or abject, belief in falsehood without question.

This is the Mob Rule when the Mob is Brainwashed, or their consent is manufactured.

Response conditioning

Behavioral modification

This happens:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amend...

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.

What does that mean in real terms?

This:

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

The FED has to have The IRS.

Why?

This reason:

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol3/...

"Mr. GEORGE MASON. Mr. Chairman, whether the Constitution be good or bad, the present clause clearly discovers that it is a national government, and no longer a Confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the general government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes does, of itself, entirely change the confederation of the states into one consolidated government. This power, being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of control, must carry every thing before it. The very idea of converting what was formerly a confederation to a consolidated government, is totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the state governments. Will the people of this great community submit to be individually taxed by two different and distinct powers? Will they suffer themselves to be doubly harassed? These two concurrent powers cannot exist long together; the one will destroy the other: the general government being paramount to, and in every respect more powerful than the state governments, the latter must give way to the former. Is it to be supposed that one national government will suit so extensive a country, embracing so many climates, and containing inhabitants so very different in manners, habits, and customs? It is ascertained, by history, that there never was a government over a very extensive country without destroying the liberties of the people: history also, supported by the opinions of the best writers, shows us that monarchy may suit a large territory, and despotic governments ever so extensive a country, but that popular governments can only exist in small territories. Is there a single example, on the face of the earth, to support a contrary opinion? Where is there one exception to this general rule? Was there ever an instance of a general national government extending over so extensive a country, abounding in such a variety of climates, &c., where the people retained their liberty? I solemnly declare that no man is a greater friend to a firm union of the American states than I am; but, sir, if this great end can be obtained without hazarding the rights of the people, why should we recur to such dangerous principles?"

It is a perilous time.

World War III is being purchased with money borrowed from all the producers on the planet, practically speaking, that is the meaning of these Trade Wars, where each country is working to out print each other country, so called countries, when it is the orchestrated work of the single Money Monopoly Power.

They are buying World War III.

Asia is set to "win".

And the "winners" collect what they then call debt.

It isn't funny, it is stupid.

They borrow from us. Then they say we owe them.

How stupid can stupid get?

Wannna find out?

Keep funding the best liars for lying so well.

Joe