Comment: Should name this (RonPaul sues Ronpaul.com?) in my Opinion

(See in situ)


Should name this (RonPaul sues Ronpaul.com?) in my Opinion

EDIT: It has been pointed out that it isn't a law suit it is what is called an "arbitration"
It is ron paul's name and they use ron paul's image. And he has no control over what they promote on that website. There could be all kinds of libelous postings and writing in it. That isn't what matters, it is the fact that it is his name and they are using his image and he is a public figure.

I'm not saying it is right. It's definitely odd. Who knows if its true yet we need a better source but I'm not going to say what is or isn't.

I was always neutral on this controversy. I for one think if someone had a website with my name and used my picture I would sue them.

Its not ronpaulforums.com its not ronpaulswag.com , it is RonPaul.com
ofcourse what about RonaldPaul.com and RonaldErnestPaul.com blah blah blah. This is a headcase issue.

So You can talk about "market prices" blah blah but this isn't about that this is about a domain name for web property that claims a great deal of ownership over his image on the web.

Ever since his chris kyle comments on a website with his own name they've been tearing him up. I think to sue for the domain is not an unprecedented move. I'm not saying it is right.