Comment: If

(See in situ)


If Ron came after the DailyPaul or RonPaulForums I wouldn't agree with him. For the same reasons, I side with the owners on this. I don't think they're very good liberty folk for not wanting Ron to have, but it's theirs to do as they want. There are a lot of people named Ron Paul. If the website name was then he might have a legitimate claim here.

This is just not Ron Paul like. To use an international government agency to strip someone of their property which they have toiled over and invested in? Weird.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."

Click Here To See The Candidates On The Record