Comment: i don't think that was his point.

(See in situ)


i don't think that was his point.

i don't think he's in favor of any one group dictating over others. non-aggression principle or not. at least, i didn't hear that. the way i heard it, he would have a problem with constitutionalists attempting to regain the assumed authority of the constitution and forcing it on others--after the collapse. he was saying that whoever wants to abide by a constitution can, but only those that agree and sign on to it.