The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Listen carefully
Listen carefully
P <--> Q
This is called a biconditional. ; )
I'm saying, if the person contracted with the firm on the condition of limited liability, then the firm has limited liability with respect to their obligation to that person.
And the inverse:
If the person did not contract with the firm on the condition of limited liability, then the firm does not have limited liability with respect to their obligation to that person.
Replies to this comment: