The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: You're right
You're right
There is no high road here. Part of the problem with the courts is that they compromise objectivity by receiving a fat check from one governing body or another.
One person compromising principle in exchange for a payoff won't bring the system down, but very likely bring that person down.
Had Dr Paul compromised his constitutional beliefs a single time while in office, his recent campaign would not have enjoyed the traction it did. Perhaps Dr Paul should have taken the payoff a long time ago and then used those funds to fight the system or just to sabotage it? Nope. It doesn't work.
Replies to this comment: